Almost never in the way they are describing. Threats to take the children, leave you with nothing, or bury you in court are a control tactic, and they work because they are terrifying and because you have no way to check them. In reality, courts divide marital property under state law rather than by who is angrier, custody is decided on best-interest factors rather than by threat, and child support is a legal obligation your ex does not get to withdraw. A wealthier or better-connected ex has real advantages in stamina and firepower, but money does not decide custody.
Threats are a tactic, not a forecast
The purpose of “I will take the kids and leave you with nothing” is to make you settle for less than you are entitled to. It is most effective early, when you do not yet know how the process works. The antidote is information: a consultation with a family law attorney will tell you what is realistically at stake in your state.
“If you leave, I won’t support the kids”
Child support is a legal obligation determined by state guidelines, generally driven by income and parenting time. It is not a favor your ex chooses to provide, and there are enforcement mechanisms including wage garnishment and license suspension. A parent who says this is describing what they want, not what the law permits.
If your ex is wealthy or well connected
Be honest about what money does buy: a more aggressive attorney, more experts, and the ability to sustain litigation longer than you can. That is a real disadvantage and worth planning around. What it does not buy is custody. Courts assess parenting, stability, and the child’s relationship with each parent, not lifestyle, and a child preferring the bigger house with the pool is not the test. Some states also allow fee-shifting, where the higher-earning spouse contributes to your legal costs, which is worth asking your attorney about early.
Keep the threats
Screenshot them. A parent who puts “I will make sure you never see them again” in writing has handed you evidence about their willingness to support your relationship with the children, which is a custody factor in most states. What is designed to frighten you can end up working in your favor.
Sorting real risk from intimidation is one of the most useful things to do early in a case, and it is a lot of what BTGO’s coaching does. Take the state-specific parts to a local attorney.
Frequently asked questions
My ex says they will take the kids and all the money. Can they?
Almost never as described. Property is divided under state law, custody is decided on best-interest factors, and child support is a legal obligation. These threats are a control tactic designed to make you settle early.
My ex says they will not support the kids if I leave. Is that true?
No. Child support is set by state guidelines based on income and parenting time, and it is enforceable through wage garnishment and other mechanisms. It is not optional.
If my ex is rich, will they win custody?
No. Money buys a stronger legal team and staying power, which matters, but custody turns on parenting and the child’s best interests, not lifestyle or income.
My kids like my ex’s house better. Will that decide custody?
No. A nicer house or more entertainment is not the standard. Courts weigh stability, the parent-child relationship, and each parent’s capacity to meet the child’s needs.
What should I do with threatening messages?
Save and screenshot them. Written threats about taking the children can become evidence about your ex’s unwillingness to support your relationship with them, which is a custody factor in most states.
Related: all answers in this topic · all answers
